FRC finalises overhaul of fraud and going concern auditing standards
The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has published the final revisions to two cornerstone UK auditing standards governing how auditors approach fraud risk and the assessment of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The updated standards, ISA (UK) 240 and ISA (UK) 570, were issued on 30 April 2026 and will apply to audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or after 15 December 2026.
For financial services professionals, the revisions carry meaningful implications for governance, financial reporting and the broader audit relationship.
ISA (UK) 240 (Revised March 2026), which addresses the auditor’s responsibilities relating to fraud, has been reinforced to embed more robust risk assessment procedures and to introduce greater transparency in audit reporting. The enhancements are particularly pertinent for publicly traded entities, where investor and market scrutiny of fraud detection has intensified following a series of high-profile corporate failures in recent years.
Audit committees of listed firms, banks and insurers should therefore expect their external auditors to probe fraud risk indicators more deeply, including the design and operating effectiveness of relevant internal controls, and to communicate findings with a sharper focus in audit reports.
The revised ISA (UK) 570 on going concern strengthens the auditor’s evaluation of management’s assessment of an entity’s ability to continue trading, and how that conclusion is communicated to users of the financial statements.
Recent corporate collapses have placed the going concern judgement under particular pressure, and stakeholders, including lenders, institutional investors and regulators, have increasingly looked to the audit report for assurance on the durability of the business model and the adequacy of liquidity planning. The revisions respond directly to those heightened expectations and are likely to influence how forecasts, stress-testing assumptions and viability disclosures are challenged during the audit process.
Both revisions follow a public consultation and bring the UK framework into alignment with the equivalent international standards recently updated by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB).
The FRC has emphasised that maintaining convergence with international standards is critical to preserving the equivalence of UK and international auditing frameworks, a point of considerable importance to cross-border financial services groups, dual-listed entities and global asset managers that rely on consistent assurance regimes across jurisdictions.
A notable feature of this exercise is that the UK had already moved ahead of the international community on several fronts, having updated its standards in advance of the IAASB’s revisions. Now the FRC anticipates that the final changes will require only modest additional effort from auditors beyond what is needed to meet the international requirements themselves.
For finance functions and audit committees, this should translate into a comparatively smooth transition rather than a wholesale overhaul of audit procedures, although firms will still need to ensure that internal documentation, management representations and supporting evidence are calibrated to the refreshed expectations.
The 15 December 2026 effective date provides a reasonable runway for preparation. Chief financial officers, heads of internal audit and audit committee chairs would be well advised to engage early with their external auditors on the practical application of the revised standards, particularly in areas such as fraud risk identification in complex financial instruments, the assessment of forward-looking liquidity scenarios and the disclosure of material uncertainties.
Early dialogue should help avoid surprises during the first reporting cycle under the new requirements and support a coherent narrative for investors and other stakeholders.

