Robin Turnbull: What firms need to know following the Rockstar North row
Robin Turnbull
On 31 October last year, reports emerged that Rockstar North, the well-known games developer, had dismissed more than 30 staff in the UK – sparking headlines for all the wrong reasons, writes Robin Turnbull.
The Independent Workers’ Union of Great Britain moved quickly to tell media that the workers affected had been members of the union, and of a chat group on Discord, claiming they were dismissed for “trade union activity” and claimed that the dismissals were “unlawful and retaliatory.” The controversy comes at a time when Rockstar’s flagship title, Grand Theft Auto, has seen its next instalment delayed yet still managed to scoop up two major industry awards, underscoring the studio’s complex mix of success and scrutiny.
The news has caught the attention of businesses in the UK, particularly in the tech sector which has seen trade union membership growing over the past few years. There are clear lessons to be learned here for businesses, particularly in Scotland’s burgeoning tech scene, on how to avoid a similar public crisis.
Understand trade unions and the laws protecting them
Trade union activity is strongly protected under UK law and can make disciplinary action risky for employers if it can be argued that they have taken action against staff because of union activity. If the main reason for the dismissal is their union activity, it is automatically unfair and can result in uncapped compensation. The employee is protected regardless of their length of service. If employees claim they were dismissed for union organising, employers can face an uphill evidential and legal task to show any sanction was for another legitimate reason.
It’s important to understand that “gross misconduct” is not some sort of catch-all term for dismissing employees easily. In fact, a tribunal would look very carefully at alleged misconduct and require strong proof of it. If action is taken against an employer, the case may stand or fall on the quality of the investigation and evidence.
When unions challenge dismissals on the grounds of trade union activity, employers who can demonstrate - with thorough documentation – that the dismissal was for unrelated, legitimate reasons will be in a much stronger position to defend their actions than those who act hastily without proper records. However, in some cases, even the best paper trail may not be enough, if the conduct in question is too closely linked to union activity, to be legally justified.
The Employment Rights Act now makes it much harder for employers to dismiss staff by introducing a right not to be unfairly dismissed after six months, removing the current two-year service requirement. This right is expected to apply to ordinary unfair dismissal, as the automatic unfair dismissal protections (including for trade union activity) already apply from day one.
Don’t jump straight to dismissals
In the event of any dispute or perceived wrongdoing, employers would be wise to first consider settlement discussions that might reduce costs and reputational damage.
If any other businesses are concerned that they could face similar issues to those Rockstar North is reportedly up against, it’s wise to review manager training on what constitutes protected trade union activity, whistleblowing, confidentiality limits, and the importance of evidence. Businesses do not want to find themselves facing costly, arduous legal action because of a misinformed management decision, so it’s vital that decision makers at all levels are up to speed.
It’s generally good practice to review past discipline records and be prepared to treat similar behaviour the same way, to help avoid claims.
Communicating with your staff must be a priority – especially if a major decision or change has been made. Whilst many aspects of HR and dismissal processes can require strict confidentiality, employers should take advice on what they can communicate to other staff so they feel informed and supported, and to avoid causing anxiety and mistrust.
Consider engaging with trade unions first
In cases where union recognition is inevitable and there is clear majority support among staff, a hardline approach can ultimately prove counterproductive. The Employment Rights Act makes union recognition easier, lowering the thresholds for success.
Some employers may not fully appreciate the positive aspects that trade union or employee representation can bring – not just for employees, but for businesses too. In some cases, constructive engagement with unions including putting in place an appropriate voluntary agreement, supported by legal and HR advice, can lay the groundwork for a positive working relationship.
Well-managed relationships with trade unions can be mutually beneficial. Employers must also realise, and this has been very evident in this recent news, that trade unions are typically well organised, particularly when it comes to media relations and communications. An aggressive approach against a union rarely pays off as it can quickly lead to the kind of challenging situation Rockstar North finds itself in.
Get your communications right
Aggressive disciplinary action may be challenging to justify. Not only might there be backlash from former staff but, as we are seeing in this case, existing staff may raise issues too – such as the 200-plus Rockstar North staff who signed a letter demanding “immediate reinstatement” of their dismissed colleagues.
For employers, this highlights the risk that robust action against union activity can galvanise support for unionisation and trigger legal and reputational challenges. Constructive engagement with staff can sometimes be more effective than confrontation – helping to protect both your business and workplace culture.
![]()
Robin Turnbull is a partner at Anderson Strathern

